Overdiagnosis of Breast Cancer in Older Women—and Unnecessary Treatment—Is Widespread: Study

Over 240,000 women in the United States will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year, and most will likely start treatment immediately. But according to new research, that may be a mistake.

Breast cancer in women ages 70 to 85 is often overdiagnosed, which may lead to unwarranted worry and unnecessary and intensive treatments like surgery and chemotherapy that don’t improve quality of life.

“Overdiagnosis refers to a phenomenon where we find breast cancers through screening that never would have caused symptoms,” said Dr. Ilana Richman, the paper’s lead author and an assistant professor of medicine at the Yale School of Medicine. “Overdiagnosis can occur when cancers grow very slowly or if a person’s life expectancy is short.”

Reevaluating Screening Practices for Older Patients

Published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, the research underscores the importance of reevaluating screening practices and engaging in informed discussions with patients.

Although mammography is a standard screening method for breast cancer, the study highlights a gap in research for older women. Individuals over 74 have frequently been excluded from large randomized screening trials, leaving uncertainty regarding the full spectrum of screening benefits and potential drawbacks.

The study, involving 54,635 women aged 70 and above, analyzed breast cancer diagnoses and related fatalities over a 15-year follow-up period.

The results indicate a significant likelihood of overdiagnosis among older women. Specifically, an estimated 31 percent of women aged 70 to 74 were overdiagnosed, as well as 47 percent of those aged 75 to 84, and 54 percent of those aged 85 and older.

“That finding points to a real need for better tools to identify which women may benefit from screening and which breast cancers are unlikely to be progressive so that we can avoid overtreatment,” Dr. Richman said.

The Challenge of Overdiagnosis: Risks vs. Benefits

There are two primary challenges to putting the study findings into clinical practice.

First, balancing the risks of overdiagnosis against potential screening benefits is difficult on an individual basis, given the current uncertainties in the data, according to Dr. Richman.

Second, discussing the concept of overdiagnosis with patients presents communication difficulties, she added. As an abstract, unfamiliar idea that cannot be directly observed, it does not fit neatly into busy clinic visits.

To address these issues, tools are needed to support patient-provider conversations and provide personalized information to women, Dr. Richman said. “[This] can help ensure that decisions about screening are concordant with our patients’ values.”

Breast cancer rates peak among women aged 70 to 74, according to the American Cancer Society. The risk decreases as women age into their 80s, partly because women tend to die from other causes instead, such as heart disease or other cancers.

Improved Detection Comes at a Cost of Surging Overdiagnosis Rates

Recent technological advancements—such as three-dimensional mammography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PT) scans—have increased detection rates.

However, the sensitivity of these advanced images leads them to detect a wide range of abnormalities, including noncancerous lesions, slow-growing tumors, and lesions that may spontaneously regress.

The introduction of screening programs has led to sharp rises in invasive breast cancer diagnoses—even for abnormalities that typically naturally regress.

In the present paradigm, once cancer is detected, it’s typically treated with aggressively with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. However, this amplified volume of treatment increases the risks of complications and financial burden, especially for older patients. It also unnecessarily exposes women to repeated radiation from mammograms.

A mammogram is essentially an X-ray, a form of ionizing radiation that has raised concerns due to its risk of causing radiation-induced breast cancer.

The central dilemma is that increased detection does not equate to improved outcomes. More research is needed to determine appropriate screening guidelines, especially for women over 75. The goal is to identify cancers destined to progress while avoiding overtreatment of regressive or indolent lesions.

In May, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel of experts that provides screening guidelines for clinicians, issued new recommendations. The experts advised starting routine breast cancer screening at age 40 instead of 50. However, they also acknowledged the need for further research on screening benefits and harms to determine appropriate guidelines for women over 75.

Important Notice: This article was originally published at www.theepochtimes.com by Jessie Zhang where all credits are due.


The watching, interacting, and participation of any kind with anything on this page does not constitute or initiate a doctor-patient relationship with Dr. Farrah™. None of the statements here have been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The products of Dr. Farrah™ are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The information being provided should only be considered for education and entertainment purposes only. If you feel that anything you see or hear may be of value to you on this page or on any other medium of any kind associated with, showing, or quoting anything relating to Dr. Farrah™ in any way at any time, you are encouraged to and agree to consult with a licensed healthcare professional in your area to discuss it. If you feel that you’re having a healthcare emergency, seek medical attention immediately. The views expressed here are simply either the views and opinions of Dr. Farrah™ or others appearing and are protected under the first amendment.

Dr. Farrah™ is a highly experienced Licensed Medical Doctor certified in evidence-based clinical nutrition, not some enthusiast, formulator, or medium promoting the wild and unrestrained use of nutrition products for health issues without clinical experience and scientific evidence of therapeutic benefit. Dr. Farrah™ has personally and keenly studied everything she recommends, and more importantly, she’s closely observed the reactions and results in a clinical setting countless times over the course of her career involving the treatment of over 150,000 patients.

Dr. Farrah™ promotes evidence-based natural approaches to health, which means integrating her individual scientific and clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. By individual clinical expertise, I refer to the proficiency and judgment that individual clinicians acquire through clinical experience and clinical practice.

Dr. Farrah™ does not make any representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness, or completeness of any multimedia content provided. Dr. Farrah™ does not warrant the performance, effectiveness, or applicability of any sites listed, linked, or referenced to, in, or by any multimedia content.

To be clear, the multimedia content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health providers with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen in any website, video, image, or media of any kind. Dr. Farrah™ hereby disclaims any and all liability to any party for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental, or other consequential damages arising directly or indirectly from any use of the content, which is provided as is, and without warranties.