Is Red Dye Safe in Food Products?

Verywell / Amelia Manley

Key Takeaways

  • The FDA has banned the use of red dye No. 3 in cosmetics and topical drugs since the 1990s, but synthetic food dyes are still allowed in food products.
  • Research shows that food colorings have been linked to ADHD symptoms in children.
  • The European Union requires products containing red dye No. 40 and five other synthetic dyes to have a health warning label.

If you’re looking for a last-minute way to share your feelings with your crush this Valentine’s Day, a flirty text or a dozen roses might be better than grabbing whatever red, heart-shaped candy is available in the checkout aisle.

Red dye No. 3 (erythrosine), a synthetic food coloring known to cause cancer in research animals, is found in thousands of products, from candy hearts to ring pops. But this additive goes well beyond Valentine’s treats to surprising pantry staples like rice and mashed potatoes.

Concerns about red dye No. 3 are not new. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned it from cosmetics and topical drugs in 1990,1 but it’s still approved for use in food and supplements.

“They said they were going to ban it in food too, but for bureaucratic reasons, I guess, they never did. And so here we are 33 years later, and Red 3 is still being produced and still being added to our food here in the U.S.,” said Thomas Galligan, PhD, the principal scientist for food additives and supplements at the Center for Science in the Public Interest in Washington DC.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest and a number of other organizations submitted a petition to the FDA in October 2022 to remove red dye No 3. from its list of approved additives for food and supplements. The FDA is currently reviewing the petition, according to a spokesperson from the agency.

Synthetic Dyes Linked to ADHD Symptoms in Children

Red No. 3 is not the only synthetic food dye health experts worry about. Brian Ronholm, director of food policy at Consumer Reports, told Verywell that synthetic food dyes have been identified as a known animal carcinogen and they’re linked to “adverse neurobehavioral symptoms.”

According to a 2021 report in California, certain food dyes like red No. 3 and red No. 40 may contribute to hyperactivity in some children, Ronholm said.

The International Association of Color Manufacturers, which represents the color additives industry, responded at the time, saying that “no study has offered compelling evidence that these colors cause adverse behaviors.”

But since 2010, the European Union has required products containing red dye No. 40 and five other synthetic dyes to come with a warning that these “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”2

Similar health warnings are not listed on U.S. products, but synthetic dyes are required to be named on ingredient lists. Galligan said the only way for U.S. consumers to avoid harmful food coloring nowadays is to check product labels. “That’s an unreasonable burden in our opinion,” he said.

Experts Say Consuming Red Dyes Are Not Worth the Risk

Arguments over the use of synthetic dyes in foods are ongoing. Although studies haven’t shown that red dye No. 3 directly causes cancer in humans, it might not be worth the risk. “The baseline assumption is that if something causes cancer in an animal, it will cause cancer in humans,” he said.

Additives known to cause cancer in humans or animals are technically not allowed to be used in food products according to the decades-old Delaney Clause, a provision in the Color Additive Amendments of 1960 that states that the FDA should consider these additives “unsafe.”3 The recent red 3 petition uses this as one of the main arguments for banning the dye.

“It’s absurd that it’s taken FDA so long to act on Red 3 in particular,” Galligan said.

While the petition signers wait for a response, Galligan said the public could also reach out to their local lawmakers and ask them to prioritize food chemical issues.

“The way it’s regulated at a federal level is just kind of broken. We need wholesale reform and that doesn’t happen without a very energetic and vocal base of constituents who are asking for change,” Galligan said.

What This Means For You

Synthetic food dyes, including red dyes 3 and 40, don’t offer any nutritional value—they’re only added to make foods look more appealing. Some products are now made with natural food dyes, like beet juice. Information about these additives can usually be found on the ingredients list.


  1. Food and Drug Administration. Color additive status list.
  2. European Union. Food additives.
  3. Food and Drug Administration. Color additives history.

Additional Reading:

Important Notice: This article was originally published at by Stephanie Brown where all credits are due. Fact checked by Nick Blackmer


The watching, interacting, and participation of any kind with anything on this page does not constitute or initiate a doctor-patient relationship with Dr. Farrah™. None of the statements here have been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The products of Dr. Farrah™ are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The information being provided should only be considered for education and entertainment purposes only. If you feel that anything you see or hear may be of value to you on this page or on any other medium of any kind associated with, showing, or quoting anything relating to Dr. Farrah™ in any way at any time, you are encouraged to and agree to consult with a licensed healthcare professional in your area to discuss it. If you feel that you’re having a healthcare emergency, seek medical attention immediately. The views expressed here are simply either the views and opinions of Dr. Farrah™ or others appearing and are protected under the first amendment.

Dr. Farrah™ is a highly experienced Licensed Medical Doctor certified in evidence-based clinical nutrition, not some enthusiast, formulator, or medium promoting the wild and unrestrained use of nutrition products for health issues without clinical experience and scientific evidence of therapeutic benefit. Dr. Farrah™ has personally and keenly studied everything she recommends, and more importantly, she’s closely observed the reactions and results in a clinical setting countless times over the course of her career involving the treatment of over 150,000 patients.

Dr. Farrah™ promotes evidence-based natural approaches to health, which means integrating her individual scientific and clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. By individual clinical expertise, I refer to the proficiency and judgment that individual clinicians acquire through clinical experience and clinical practice.

Dr. Farrah™ does not make any representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness, or completeness of any multimedia content provided. Dr. Farrah™ does not warrant the performance, effectiveness, or applicability of any sites listed, linked, or referenced to, in, or by any multimedia content.

To be clear, the multimedia content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health providers with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen in any website, video, image, or media of any kind. Dr. Farrah™ hereby disclaims any and all liability to any party for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental, or other consequential damages arising directly or indirectly from any use of the content, which is provided as is, and without warranties.